Medina

Medina v. Family Healthcare Network

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20201:20-cv-01030California1,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 BRADLEY MEDINA and SVETLANA CASE NO. 1:20-CV-01030-AWI-SKO

KRIVENCHEVA,

7 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON DEFENDANT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA’S MOTION TO v. DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

COURTNEY L. MAPES, M.D., AND DOE ONE THROUGH DOE FIFTY, (Doc. Nos. 7 & 8) INCLUSIVE,

Defendants.

13 14 This matter is before the Court on Defendant United States’ motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) and Plaintiffs Bradley Medina and Svetlana Krivencheva’s motion to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). Doc. Nos. 7 & 8. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ motion and grant Defendant’s. 19 BACKGROUND On February 7, 2020, Plaintiffs Bradley Medina and Svetlana Krivencheva, husband and wife, filed a complaint in Tulare County Superior Court against Family Healthcare Network, Courtney L.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.