Fisher
Fisher v. Army National Guard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHANNA FISHER and J.G., a minor, by No. 1:20-cv-01471-NONE-EPG and through her guardian ad litem, JOHANNA FISHER, Plaintiff, ORDER APPOINTING GUARDIAN AD
LITEM
v. (ECF No. 10) ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, et al., Defendants. 17 The Court has read and considered the ex parte Notice of Lodging Application and Order Appointing Guardian Ad Litem (ECF No. 4) and the Revised Notice of Lodging Application and Order Appointing Guardian Ad Litem (ECF No. 10). On October 15, 2020, Plaintiffs filed an ex parte Notice of Lodging Application and Order Appointing Guardian Ad Litem. (ECF No. 4). Because the initial notice did not comply with Local Rule 202(c), which requires the disclosure of a Plaintiff’s attorney’s interests and certain other details, the Court ordered a revised notice or motion that did comply with the rule. (ECF No. 9). Plaintiffs filed an ex parte Revised Notice of Lodging Application and Order Appointing Guardian Ad Litem on November 4,…