Four in One Company, Inc. v. SK Foods, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20202:08-cv-03017California527 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Four in One Company, et al., No. 2:08-cv-03017-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. 14 SK Foods, L.P. et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Attorney Malcolm Segal moves to withdraw as counsel for defendant Scott Salyer, which 18 | would leave Mr. Salyer without counsel. ECF No. 298. No party filed an opposition or statement 19 | of non-opposition. As explained in this order, the motion is granted. 20 If withdrawal would leave a client in propria persona, Local Rule 182(d) requires the 21 | withdrawing party to seek leave of court, file a formal motion and provide notice of the 22 | withdrawal to the client and all other parties who have appeared. The attorney must also provide 23 | an affidavit stating the current or last known address or addresses of the client and the efforts 24 | made to notify the client of the motion to withdraw. Jd. Withdrawal must also comply with the 25 | Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.