Four in One Company, Inc. v. SK Foods, L.P.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20202:08-cv-03017California527 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Four in One Company, et al., No. 2:08-cv-03017-KJM-JDP Plaintiffs, ORDER v. SK Foods, L.P. et al., Defendants. 16 Attorney Malcolm Segal moves to withdraw as counsel for defendant Scott Salyer, which would leave Mr. Salyer without counsel. ECF No. 298. No party filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition. As explained in this order, the motion is granted. If withdrawal would leave a client in propria persona, Local Rule 182(d) requires the withdrawing party to seek leave of court, file a formal motion and provide notice of the 22 withdrawal to the client and all other parties who have appeared. The attorney must also provide an affidavit stating the current or last known address or addresses of the client and the efforts made to notify the client of the motion to withdraw. Jd. Withdrawal must also comply with the Rules of Professional Conduct of the State Bar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.