(PS) Eddy v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20202:18-cv-02267California363 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK EDDY; BOBBIE EDDY, No. 2:18-cv-2267-KJM-EFB PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE CORPORATION (As Trustee for Freddie Mac MultiClass Certificates Series 3450);

BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

(As Parent to Bank of America, M.A., as Successor in Interest By Merger with Countrywide Bank, FSB); SERVICE LINK, LLC; MICHAEL M. BAKER, Esq.; Does 1-5, Defendants. 20 On September 1, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir. 2007) (“[D]eterminations of law by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.