(PS) Charles v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CASSANDRA B. CHARLES, No. 2:19-cv-2555 KJM AC (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT, et al, 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a 19 United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). 20 On April 27, 2020, the magistrate judge filed amended findings and recommendations, 21 which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 13. Plaintiff 23 has filed objections to the findings and recommendations. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the proper analysis. 27 The court writes briefly here to…