Baird

Baird v. Osteostrong Franchising, LLC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20202:20-cv-02010California2,161 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOHN P. BAIRD; BRET KURIHARA; OS No. 2:20-cv-02010-TLN-DMC

NEW MEXICO, LLC; BNS RD, LLC;

11 SEAN SIMPSON; CHARLA SIMPSON; MARY JO MCHENRY and K& L 12 WELLNESS, LLC, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’

MOTION FOR A TEMPORARY

13 Plaintiffs, RESTRAINING ORDER 14 v. 15 OSTEOSTRONG FRANCHISING, LLC; KYLE ZAGRODZKY and JOHN 16 JAQUISH, 17 Defendants. 18

19 20 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Plaintiffs John P. Baird, Bret Kurihara, OS 21 New Mexico, LLC, BNS RD, LLC, Sean Simpson, Charla Simpson, Mary Jo McHenry, and 22 K&L Wellness, LLC’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order. 23 (ECF No. 4.) No opposition has been filed by Defendants OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC, Kyle 24 Zagrodzky, and John Jaquish (collectively, “Defendants”). For the reasons set forth below, 25 Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED. 26 / / / 27 / / / 28 / / / 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 Defendant OsteoStrong Franchising, LLC (“OsteoStrong”) is a company…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.