Kibler

(HC) Reneaux v. Kibler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 6, 20202:20-cv-02139California599 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JESSIE LUIS RENEAUX, No. 2:20-cv-02139 GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT OF

CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has not, however, filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). Petitioner will be provided the opportunity to either submit the appropriate affidavit in support of a request to proceed in forma pauperis or submit the appropriate filing fee. Review of petitioner’s habeas petition shows petitioner has not signed the petition. Apparently, the last page of the petition was omitted from petitioner’s filing. Parties proceeding without counsel are required to sign all pleadings, motions, and other papers submitted to the

1 "A petitioner for habeas corpus relief must name the state officer having custody of him or her 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.