Taber

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MIGUEL SANCHEZ, Case No. 2:20-cv-0946-JDP-P

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

TAMARA TABER, et al.,

STATE A CLAIM, AND FAILURE TO

Defendants. COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 15 Plaintiff Miguel Sanchez is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action. Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) on September 29, 2020, and plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. See ECF No. 13. Plaintiff has not yet done so. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. When a plaintiff fails to comply with court-imposed deadlines, the court may dismiss the plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[T]he…