Taber

1

2

3

4

5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 MIGUEL SANCHEZ, Case No. 2:20-cv-0946-JDP-P

10 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

11 v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

12 TAMARA TABER, et al.,

STATE A CLAIM, AND FAILURE TO

13 Defendants. COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

14 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 15 16 Plaintiff Miguel Sanchez is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this action. 17 Plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) on September 29, 2020, 18 and plaintiff was granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. See ECF No. 13. Plaintiff 19 has not yet done so. 20 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines and requires litigants to 21 meet those deadlines. When a plaintiff fails to comply with court-imposed deadlines, the court 22 may dismiss the plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Hells Canyon 23 Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[T]he…