Armstrong

Armstrong v. FCA US LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20201:19-cv-01275California6,739 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH ARMSTRONG, No. 1:19-cv-01275-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND THIS ACTION AND

FCA US LLC, and LAMPE CHRYSLER DENYING DEFENDANT LAMPE

DODGE JEEP RAM, CHRYSLER DODGE JEEP RAM’S RULE

MOTION Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 8, 9, 11, 19)

17 This matter came before the court on November 5, 2019 for a hearing on plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Tulare County Superior Court. (Doc. No. 11.) Attorneys Benjeman Beck and Long Cao appeared telephonically on behalf of plaintiff. Attorney Parris Schmidt appeared telephonically on behalf of defendant FCA US LLC (“FCA”). There was no appearance made on behalf of defendant Lampe Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram (“Lampe”), which at the time of the hearing, had not yet appeared in this case. For the reasons explained below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to remand.

1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.