(SS) Lamas v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20201:19-cv-00852California7,956 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

7 JUANITA LAMAS, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00852-BAM 8 Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL 9 v. ) S ECURITY COMPLAINT ) 10 ANDREW M. SAUL,1 Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) 11 ) Defendant. ) 12 ) 13 14 INTRODUCTION 15 Plaintiff Juanita Lamas (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 16 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her application for supplemental security 17 income (“SSI”) under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is currently before the Court on 18 the parties’ briefs, which were submitted, without oral argument, to Magistrate Judge Barbara A. 19 McAuliffe.2 20 Having considered the briefing and record in this matter, the Court finds the decision of the 21 Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) to be supported by substantial evidence in the record as a whole 22 and based upon proper legal standards. Accordingly, this Court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.