King

(PC) Dalke v. King

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20201:20-cv-00534California1,031 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8

9 JOSHUA JASON DALKE, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00534-AWI-SAB (PC) ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 11 v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR ORDER OF COMPLIANCE AND MOTION

12 KING CLARK, et al., ) FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE DENIED ) 13 Defendants. ) (ECF Nos. 33, 34) ) 14 ) ) 15 )

16 Plaintiff Joshua Jason Dalke is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for order of compliance by Defendants and 19 motion for preliminary injunction, filed November 6, 2020. 20 I. 21 DISCUSSION 22 The purpose of a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction is to preserve the 23 status quo if the balance of equities so heavily favors the moving party that justice requires the court to 24 intervene to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.