Gaylord

Gaylord v. The Clay House

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20201:20-cv-00972California791 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ANDREW GAYLORD, Case No. 1:20-cv-00972-AWI-SKO

9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE FOR

10 PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY v.

WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS AND

11 FAILURE TO PROSECUTE THE CLAY HOUSE, et al., 12 (Docs. 5, 6) Defendants. 13 TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE

14 15 On July 14, 2020, Plaintiff Andrew Gaylord, proceeding pro se, filed a civil complaint 16 against Defendants The Clay House and Kevin La Puerta. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff purports to allege 17 claims under (1) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violation of his Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment rights and 18 (2) California Penal Code § 422.6(a). (Id. at 6.) Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages in the 19 amount of $100,000 and punitive damages in the amount of $100,000. (Id. at 7.) Plaintiff also 20 filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on July 17, 2020. (Docs. 2, 21 3.)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.