Gomez

(PC) Dickson v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20201:17-cv-00294California6,888 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRISTOPHER DICKSON, Case No. 1:17-cv-00294-DAD-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

TO SUPPLEMENT

13 v. (ECF No. 54)

14 GOMEZ, et al., ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STRIKE UNAUTHORIZED

15 Defendants. SURREPLY (ECF No. 55) 16

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

17 REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR

18 FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

19 (ECF No. 37) 20 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 21 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 23 I. Background 24 Plaintiff Christopher Dickson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 25 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 26 Plaintiff’s second amended complaint against Defendants Gomez, Rios, and Martinez for 27 excessive force, against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.