Pfeiffer
(PC) Steward v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
DONNY STEWARD,
9 Case No. 1:19-cv-01022-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, 10
ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE
v. WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT FIND 11
HIM IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL RULE
12 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11(b) AND
SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS UNDER
13 Defendants. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11(c) 14
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RE-OPEN
15 THE CASE AS MOOT
16 (ECF No. 35)
17 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
18 19 Plaintiff, Donny Steward, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 20 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 For the reasons discussed below, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why the Court 22 should not find Plaintiff in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b), and subject to 23 sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c). 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff filed the original complaint commencing this action on…