Pfeiffer

(PC) Steward v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20201:19-cv-01022California2,390 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

DONNY STEWARD,

9 Case No. 1:19-cv-01022-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, 10

ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO SHOW CAUSE

v. WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT FIND 11

HIM IN VIOLATION OF FEDERAL RULE

12 CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11(b) AND

SUBJECT TO SANCTIONS UNDER

13 Defendants. FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 11(c) 14

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RE-OPEN

15 THE CASE AS MOOT

16 (ECF No. 35)

17 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Plaintiff, Donny Steward, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 20 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 21 For the reasons discussed below, the Court orders Plaintiff to show cause why the Court 22 should not find Plaintiff in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(b), and subject to 23 sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c). 24 I. BACKGROUND 25 Plaintiff filed the original complaint commencing this action on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.