Gomez

(PC) McElroy v. Gomez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20201:20-cv-00658California9,201 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LATWAHN MCELROY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00658-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

GOMEZ, et al., ) A COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, ) AND FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE Defendants. ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) ) (ECF Nos. 8, 33) ) )

Plaintiff Latwahn McElroy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND This case has a rather lengthy history given Plaintiff’s failure to comply and/or respond to the Court’s orders. On June 11, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claims were stated, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) On this same…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.