Gomez

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 LATWAHN MCELROY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00658-NONE-SAB (PC) ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. ) RECOMMENDING THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

14 GOMEZ, et al., ) A COURT ORDER, FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, ) AND FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE 15 Defendants. ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) 16 ) (ECF Nos. 8, 33) ) 17 )

18 Plaintiff Latwahn McElroy is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. 21 PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 22 This case has a rather lengthy history given Plaintiff’s failure to comply and/or respond to the Court’s 23 orders. 24 On June 11, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found no cognizable claims were 25 stated, and granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 8.) 26 On this same…