Bravo Development Group, Inc. v. Trinity Medical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20202:19-cv-00224California1,080 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRAVO DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC., No. 2:19-cv-00224-TLN-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL

14 TRINITY MEDICAL, INC.; TRINITY FOR PLAINTIFF

MEDICAL S.C.; ENRIQUE GAZA

15 REYES, JR.; and SUZETTE REYES, 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court pursuant to Krogh & Decker, LLP’s (“Krogh & Decker”) 19 unopposed Motion for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Bravo Development Group, 20 Inc. (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 11.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. 21 Plaintiff engaged Krogh & Decker to represent it in the instant trademark infringement 22 suit, which alleges claims for (1) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1114, (2) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 23 1125(a), (3) violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1125(c), (4) defamation, and (5) violation of the California 24 Unfair Competition Law (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code §§ 17200–17210). (ECF No. 1 at 5–8; ECF 25 No. 11-1 at 1.) Krogh & Decker maintains that “there has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.