Moore

(PC) Combs v. Moore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20201:19-cv-00390California3,946 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 DASHAWN WILSON COMBS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00390-NONE-BAM (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

12 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

13 MOORE, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

14 Defendants. (ECF No. 23) 15 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 18 I. Background 19 Plaintiff Dashawn Wilson Combs (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 21 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Moore, Ruelas, Brubaker, Ronquillo, and 22 Perez for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and for deliberate indifference to 23 medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 24 On January 16, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that 25 Plaintiff failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.