Mey

(PC) Lamon v. Mey

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20202:20-cv-01474California862 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BARRY LOUIS LAMON, No. 2:20-cv-01474-TLN-KJN 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 S. MEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this 18 civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On October 1, 2020, the magistrate judge filed two sets of findings and recommendations 21 herein which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any objections 22 to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. (ECF Nos. 14, 23 15.) On October 15, 2020, Plaintiff filed Objections to both sets of findings and 24 recommendations.1 (ECF No. 20.)

25 1 The magistrate judge also issued an Order directing service of the First Amended Complaint on the Defendants against whom the screening order found “potentially…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.