(HC) Craig v. County of El Dorado
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:20-cv-1050 DB P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 COUNTY OF EL DORADO, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 17 Petitioner, a county inmate proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a finding that he violated the terms of 19 his probation. 20 SCREENING 21 I. Screening Requirement 22 Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, this court is required to conduct 23 a preliminary review of all petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. Pursuant to 24 Rule 4, this court must summarily dismiss a petition if it “plainly appears from the petition and 25 any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” 26 II. Exhaustion 27 There is no question that the exhaustion of state court remedies is a prerequisite to the 28 granting of a petition for writ of…