(PC) Sosa v. CSATF Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20201:19-cv-01333California4,344 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JORGE LUIS SOSA, No. 1:19-cv-01333-NONE-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT’S

13 v. MOTION TO DISMISS BE GRANTED AND

THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE

14 R. HULSE, DISMISSED 15 Defendant. (ECF No. 18) 16 17 Jorge Luis Sosa (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in 18 this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case is proceeding on Plaintiff’s 19 claims against Defendant R. Hulse (“Defendant”) and Does 1-3 for excessive force and sexual 20 assault in violation of Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights and retaliation in violation of 21 Plaintiff’s First Amendment rights. (ECF Nos. 1 & 20 at 2). 22 On April 9, 2020, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that 23 Plaintiff’s claims are time-barred by the statute of limitations. (ECF No. 18 at 1). Following a 24 court order for additional briefing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.