Davis

Davis v. Loo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20201:20-cv-01096California1,849 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHANDA DAVIS, No. 1:20-cv-01096-DAD-JLT 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST

DEFENDANT OMNI FAMILY HEALTH

14 SHERWIN YU YEE LOO, D.C., et al., CENTER AND OMNI FAMILY HEATLH,

INC. AND REMANDING THIS ACTION TO

15 Defendants. THE KERN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT 16 (Doc. No. 3)

17

18 19 This matter is before the court on the unopposed motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims 20 brought against defendants Omni Family Health Center and Omni Family Health, Inc., 21 (collectively “Omni Health”) for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. (Doc. No. 3.) In moving to 22 dismiss those claims, defendant United States argues that plaintiff did not complete the Federal 23 Tort Claims Act’s (“FTCA”) administrative tort claims process before filing suit as is required.1 24 (Id.) Pursuant to General Order No. 617 addressing the public health emergency posed by the 25 COVID-19 pandemic, the motion was taken under submission…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.