Diaz
(PC) Hammler v. Diaz
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20201:20-cv-00488California2,024 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 ALLEN HAMMLER, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-0488 JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE
v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DENY PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
RALPH DIAZ, et al., FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) AND THAT PLAINTIFF BE
Defendants. REQUIRED TO PAY FILING FEE IN FULL
(Docs. 1, 2)
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE Plaintiff has filed a complaint asserting constitutional claims against governmental employees. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has not, however, submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or paid the $400.0 filing fee for this action. Instead, he moves for leave to file a new case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).1 (Doc. 2.) ///
1 Plaintiff also references a vexatious litigant pre-filing order issued in Hammler v. Alvarez, 3:18-cv-0326-AJB-WVG (S.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2019).…