Diaz
(PC) Hammler v. Diaz
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10 11 ALLEN HAMMLER, CASE NO. 1:20-cv-0488 JLT (PC)
12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE
13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO
DENY PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO PROCEED IN
14 RALPH DIAZ, et al., FORMA PAUPERIS UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) AND THAT PLAINTIFF BE
15 Defendants. REQUIRED TO PAY FILING FEE IN FULL
16 (Docs. 1, 2)
17 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiff has filed a complaint asserting constitutional claims against governmental 19 employees. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has not, however, submitted an application to proceed in forma 20 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 or paid the $400.0 filing fee for this action. Instead, he moves 21 for leave to file a new case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).1 (Doc. 2.) 22 ///
23 1 Plaintiff also references a vexatious litigant pre-filing order issued in Hammler v. Alvarez, 3:18-cv-0326-AJB-WVG (S.D. Cal. Aug. 13, 2019).…