(PS) Copeland v. Challenge Security Services Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20202:18-cv-01435California1,118 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZUKEYNA COPELAND, No. 2:18-cv-01435-TLN-CKD PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CHALLENGE SECURITY SERVICES,

INC.,

15 Defendants. 16 On May 14, 2018, plaintiff filed the present action through counsel. (ECF No. 1) On May 16, 2019, counsel moved to withdraw. (ECF No. 10). Counsel’s motion was granted by the District Judge assigned to this matter on January 21, 2020. (ECF No. 12). Thereafter the undersigned scheduled a status conference and directed plaintiff to file a status report at least fourteen days prior to the conference. (ECF No. 14). Plaintiff was cautioned that “[f]ailure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.” (Id.) Plaintiff failed to file the status report as directed. In response to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute her case and follow orders from the court, on March 2, 2020, the court issued an order for plaintiff to show cause as to why this case should not 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.