Arnold

Arnold v. National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20201:20-cv-01372California756 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARIA ENCAR ARNOLD, Case No. 1:20-cv-01372-NONE-BAM Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S

v. APPLICATIONS FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED

IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION, (Docs. 2, 4) 15 Defendant. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 16 17 Plaintiff Maria Encar Arnold (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se in this civil matter, initiated this action on September 28, 2020. (Doc. 1). On the same day, Plaintiff filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff’s application was insufficient for the Court to determine if she is entitled to proceed without prepayment of fees in this action. Accordingly, the Court directed Plaintiff to complete and file an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Long Form) – AO 239. (Doc. 3.) On October 26, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Long Form application, along with a written…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.