Duran

Duran v. Lepore

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20201:20-cv-01562California1,148 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOLYNN DURAN, No. 1:20-cv-01562-NONE-EPG 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. SUA SPONTE ORDER REMANDING

ACTION TO STATE COURT

14 RYAN LEPORE, et al., (Doc. No. 1) 15 Defendants.

16 17 The undersigned revokes any actual or anticipated referral to a magistrate judge for the 18 purposes of findings and recommendations in this case. 19 On November 5, 2020, defendant1 Jolynn Duran filed a pro se Notice of Removal with 20 this court, seeking to remove an action from the Superior Court for the County of Merced. (Doc. 21 No. 1.) For the following reasons, the court sua sponte REMANDS this case to the Merced 22 County Superior Court. 23 Under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a), a defendant may remove an action to federal court if the 24 district court has original jurisdiction. Hunter v. Phillip Morris USA, 582 F.3d 1039, 1042 (9th 25 Cir. 2009). If at any time before final judgment it appears that the district court lacks subject 26 1 Though Jolynn Duran has named herself as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.