Matteson

(PC) Reyes v. Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20202:20-cv-00815California1,581 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRAULIO ULISES REYES, Case No. 2:20-cv-0815-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER v. ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: GISELLE MATTESON, et al., (1)FILE A SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

Defendants. (2)NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND BY HIS

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO

DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS CONSISTENT WITH

THIS ORDER ECF No. 15 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 21 Plaintiff Braulio Ulises Reyes is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 15, is before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He alleges that two defendants, Francis Ko and Martin Kuorston, violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to recommend and approve surgical repair for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.