Matteson

(PC) Reyes v. Matteson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20202:20-cv-00815California1,581 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BRAULIO ULISES REYES, Case No. 2:20-cv-0815-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER 13 v. ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 14 GISELLE MATTESON, et al., (1)FILE A SECOND AMENDED

COMPLAINT; OR

15 Defendants. (2)NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE 16 WISHES TO STAND BY HIS

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO

17 DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS CONSISTENT WITH

18 THIS ORDER 19 ECF No. 15 20 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 21 22 Plaintiff Braulio Ulises Reyes is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil 23 rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s amended complaint, ECF No. 15, is 24 before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He alleges that two defendants, Francis 25 Ko and Martin Kuorston, violated his Eighth Amendment rights by failing to recommend and 26 approve surgical repair for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.