Brito

Brito v. Barr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20202:18-cv-00097California2,591 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Civ. No. 2:18-CV-00097-KJM-DB

VICTOR MANUEL BRITO SANCHEZ,

12 13 Plaintiff, AMENDED FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER 14 v. 15 WILLIAM P. BARR, United States 16 Attorney General, 17 18 Defendant. 19 20 On October 20, 2020, the court conducted a final pretrial conference. Counsel 21 Nienke Schouten appeared on behalf of plaintiff; counsel Victor Lawrence appeared for 22 defendant. On October 29, 2020, the court issued its final pretrial order, ECF No. 38. On 23 November 4, 2020, the parties timely filed joint objections to the final pretrial order. Good cause 24 appearing, the court makes the following amended findings and orders: 25 JURISDICTION/VENUE 26 Jurisdiction is predicated on 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(5)(B). The Ninth Circuit 27 determined transfer to this court was appropriate and requested this court make a factual 28 ///// 1 | determination on plaintiff's claim to be a U.S. citizen from birth. Jurisdiction and venue are not 2 | contested. 3 |…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.