Roth

Roth v. PTGMB LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20201:20-cv-00231California293 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 KELLI ROTH, Case No. 1:20-cv-00231-SAB

11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 13 PTGMB LLC, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

14 Defendant. (ECF No. 44.) 15

16 17 On February 12, 2020, Kelli Roth (“Plaintiff”) filed this action individually and behalf of 18 all others similarly situated, pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. (ECF No. 1.) 19 On November 12, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice as to 20 Plaintiff Kelli Roth, and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 44.) The 21 stipulation specifies that any claims of putative class members are dismissed without prejudice. 22 (Id.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 24 dismissed with prejudice …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.

Roth · E.D. California · 2020 | Caselegis