Roth
Roth v. PTGMB LLC
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 KELLI ROTH, Case No. 1:20-cv-00231-SAB
11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) 13 PTGMB LLC, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
14 Defendant. (ECF No. 44.) 15
16 17 On February 12, 2020, Kelli Roth (“Plaintiff”) filed this action individually and behalf of 18 all others similarly situated, pursuant to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. (ECF No. 1.) 19 On November 12, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice as to 20 Plaintiff Kelli Roth, and with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 44.) The 21 stipulation specifies that any claims of putative class members are dismissed without prejudice. 22 (Id.) In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 24 dismissed with prejudice …