Castillo
(PC) Lloyd v. Castillo
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20201:20-cv-00683California670 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADRIAN JUAN LLOYD, 1:20-cv-00683-JLT (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF
COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE;
v.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
D. CASTILLO, et al., MOTIONS FOR STATUS; AND
Defendants. (Docs. 14-15)
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER
(Doc. 4)
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE
Plaintiff has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order that would grant him authorization to wear a multicolored Rastafarian Crown and to eat a religious-based diet. For the 22 reasons set forth below, this motion should be denied. 23 The analysis for a temporary restraining order is substantially identical to that for a 24 preliminary injunction. Stuhlbarg Intern. Sales Co., Inc. v. John D. Brush and Co., Inc., 240 F.3d 25 832, 839 n.7…