Castillo

(PC) Lloyd v. Castillo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20201:20-cv-00683California670 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ADRIAN JUAN LLOYD, 1:20-cv-00683-JLT (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF

COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE;

13 v.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

14 D. CASTILLO, et al., MOTIONS FOR STATUS; AND

15 Defendants. (Docs. 14-15)

16 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

17 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

18 (Doc. 4)

19 FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff has filed a motion for a temporary restraining order that would grant him 21 authorization to wear a multicolored Rastafarian Crown and to eat a religious-based diet. For the 22 reasons set forth below, this motion should be denied. 23 The analysis for a temporary restraining order is substantially identical to that for a 24 preliminary injunction. Stuhlbarg Intern. Sales Co., Inc. v. John D. Brush and Co., Inc., 240 F.3d 25 832, 839 n.7…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.