Ciufo

(PC) Garraway v. Ciufo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20201:17-cv-00533California295 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MITCHELL GARRAWAY, 1:17-cv-00533-DAD-GSA (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF

13 v. SUBPOENAS AS UNTIMELY (ECF No. 115.) 14 JACQUILINE CIUFO, et al.,

15 Defendants. 16

17

18

19 20 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights 21 action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds 22 with Plaintiff’s original Complaint filed on April 17, 2017, against defendants Jacqueline Ciufo 23 (Unit Manager), K. Miller (Corrections Officer), and Lieutenant (Lt.) J. Zaragoza (collectively, 24 “Defendants”), for failure to protect Plaintiff in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF No. 1.) 25 On September 28, 2020, Plaintiff filed a request for the issuance of subpoenas duces tecum. 26 (ECF No. 115.) Plaintiff’s request is untimely because discovery was closed on June 5, 2020. 27 Pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.