Bales

Bales v. County of El Dorado

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20202:18-cv-01714California3,939 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ELIZABETH BALES, an No. 2:18-cv-01714-JAM-DB individual, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 14

COUNTY OF EL DORADO; TERI

15 MONTEROSSO; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 16 Defendants. 17 18 On June 13, 2018, Elizabeth Bales (“Plaintiff”) filed suit 19 against El Dorado County (“Defendant”) and Teri Monterosso. 20 Compl., ECF No. 1. Monterosso was dismissed as a defendant on 21 September 20, 2018. Order, ECF No. 22. Plaintiff alleges 22 Defendant retaliated against her in violation of Title VII, 42 23 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., the California Fair Employment and 24 Housing Act (“FEHA”), Cal. Gov’t Code § 12940(h) et seq., and 25 the California Whistleblower Protection Act, Cal. Lab. Code 26 § 1102.5. See generally Compl. Plaintiff also alleges 27 Defendant violated FEHA in failing to prevent discrimination and 28 retaliation against her. Id. Defendant now moves for summary 1 judgment on all four of Plaintiff’s claims. Mot. Summ. J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.