Desai

Desai v. Biden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20201:20-cv-01579California331 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4

5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 PAUL DESAI, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-1579 NONE JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO PAY THE ) FILING FEE OR FILE A MOTION TO PROCEED 13 v. IN FORMA PAUPERIS )

14 JOE BIDEN, et al., ) ) 15 Defendants. ) ) 16 )

17 Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint on November 5, 2020. As a general rule, all 18 parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a United States District Court must pay a filing 19 fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). However, the Court may authorize the commencement of an action without 20 the filing fee “by a person who submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such 21 [person] possesses that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefore.” 28 U.S.C. § 22 1915(a)(1). Therefore, an action may proceed despite a failure to prepay the filing fee only if leave to 23 proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) is granted by the Court. See Rodriguez…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.