Mkrtchyan
(PC) Harris v. Mkrtchyan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EMMETT HARRIS, Case No. 2:19-cv-01040-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES
MERCY HOSPITAL OF FOLSOM, et al., ECF No. 27 Defendants.
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS
16 On October 2, 2020, defendant Arsen Mkrtchyan filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 27. To date, plaintiff has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to a motion not more twenty-one days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. to Local Rule 230(l). Failure “to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 24 …