Mkrtchyan

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 EMMETT HARRIS, Case No. 2:19-cv-01040-JAM-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

14 MERCY HOSPITAL OF FOLSOM, et al., ECF No. 27 15 Defendants.

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

16 17 On October 2, 2020, defendant Arsen Mkrtchyan filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s 18 complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). ECF No. 27. To date, plaintiff 19 has not filed an opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion. 20 In cases where a party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, a responding party 21 is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to a motion not more twenty-one 22 days after the date the motion is served. E.D. Cal. L.R. to Local Rule 230(l). Failure “to file an 23 opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to 24 …