(PC) Quair v. CDCR HQ

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20202:19-cv-01106California1,238 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID SABINO QUAIR, III, No. 2:19-cv-1106 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CDCR HQ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Previously, plaintiff’s original and first amended complaints were screened and found lacking a cognizable claim. Plaintiff’s second amended complaint is now before the Court. I. Screening Requirement The in forma pauperis statute provides, “Notwithstanding any filing fee, or any portion thereof, that may have been paid, the court shall dismiss the case at any time if the court determines that . . . the action or appeal . . . fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). II. Pleading Standard Section 1983 “provides a cause of action for the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.