(PC) Colbourn v. California Courts

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20202:20-cv-00725California1,831 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORRIN TYLER COLBOURN, No. 2:20-cv-0725 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

CALIFORNIA COURTS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has requested authority pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 37, 39). This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). An earlier filed order recommending that this action be dismissed is also pending. (See ECF No. 28). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed July 27, 2020 (ECF No. 37), shall be granted, and it shall be recommended that his subsequently filed in forma pauperis application (ECF No. 39) be denied as moot. In addition, the outstanding findings and recommendations issued July 9, 2020 (ECF No. 28), will be vacated. Finally, the undersigned…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.