Brown-Martin

(PS) Martin v. Brown-Martin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20202:20-cv-02011California394 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ERICA YVONNE MARTIN, No. 2: 20-cv-2011 JAM CKD (PS) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 BRYAN MARTIN, SR., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 03, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF. 18 No. 10) herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to 19 the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. On November 04, 2020, 20 plaintiff filed objections to the proposed findings and recommendations (ECF. No. 11), which 21 have been considered by the court. 22 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an 23 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 24 Business Machines, 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981), cert. denied, 455 U.S. 920 (1982); see 25 also Dawson v. Marshall, 561 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir. 2009). As to any portion of the proposed 26 findings of fact to which no objection has been made, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.