Freeman

Freeman v. County of Sacramento Dept of Human Assistance

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20202:19-cv-02418California589 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BENNIE FREEMAN, No. 2:19-cv-02418 KJM CKD (PS) Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DEPT. OF

HUMAN ASSISTANCE,

14 Defendant. 15 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, has filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”, ECF No. 21) after his original complaint was dismissed for failure to state claim. (See ECF No. 17.) Plaintiff claims he was discriminated against in violation of Title VII and the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (Gov. Code § 12900 et. seq.) (“FEHA”) by being denied promotional opportunities due to his race. Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the FAC, which is fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 22, 23, 25.) On September 16, 2020, pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the undersigned took the matter under submission. (ECF No. 26.) In order to survive dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), a complaint must contain more than a “formulaic recitation of the elements…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.