(PS) Van Den Heuvel v. El Dorado County Judicial Court Seizures

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEAN MARC VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:20–cv–1173–JAM–CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 6) 14 EL DORADO COUNTY JUDICIAL COURT SEIZURES, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 On October 5, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations (ECF 19 No. 6), which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice that any objections to the 20 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen (14) days. On October 23, 2020, 21 plaintiff filed untimely objections to the findings and recommendations (ECF No. 7),1 which have 22 nonetheless been considered by the court. 23 This court reviews de novo those portions of the proposed findings of fact to which an 24 objection has been made. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore 25

26 1 The document docketed as plaintiff’s objections bears the present case number but is captioned as “Objections to Judge Nunley Findings, Dated August 6, 2020” and shows a different set of 27 defendants. …