(UD)(PS)Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC v. Jackson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 13, 20202:20-cv-02239California1,489 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRECKENRIDGE PROPERTY FUND No. 2:20-cv-02239-TLN-KJN 2016, LLC, 12 Plaintiff, SUA SPONTE REMAND ORDER v.

MARGARET JACKSON,

15 Defendant.

17 This matter is before the Court on Defendant Margaret Jackson’s (“Defendant”) Notice of Removal and Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1–2.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court hereby REMANDS the action to the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin, due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Defendant’s Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 2) is DENIED as moot. /// /// /// /// /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On or about May 17, 2019, Plaintiff Breckenridge Property Fund 2016, LLC (“Plaintiff”) brought an action for unlawful detainer against Defendant and DOES 1-10 for possession of certain real property located in Stockton, California. (ECF No. 1 at 10–30.) On November 9, 2020, Defendant filed a Notice of Removal, removing the unlawful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.