Porter

Porter v. Yuba City Police Dept.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20202:20-cv-01554California2,500 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 QUIANA LEI PORTER, No. 2:20-cv-1554 KJM DB PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 YUBA CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Quiana Lei Porter is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to 18 the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending 19 before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiff complains about an assault that occurred 21 during an arrest. 22 The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma 23 pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 24 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated 25 below, plaintiff’s complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend. 26 I. Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis 27 Plaintiff’s in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.