Woods

(PC) Shaw v. Woods

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 12, 20202:20-cv-01980California2,159 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM SHAW, No. 2:20-cv-1980 DB P Plaintiff, WOODS, et al.. ORDER Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the court is plaintiff’s first amended complaint for screening. For the reasons set forth below, this court finds plaintiff has stated a cognizable claim against defendant Shearer but has failed to state claims against the remaining defendants. Plaintiff will be given an opportunity to either amend his first amended complaint or proceed on the cognizable claim in his current complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initially filed this action in the Fresno division of this court. On screening, the previously assigned magistrate judge found plaintiff stated an Eighth Amendment claim against defendant Shearer but failed to state a claim against defendant Woods. Plaintiff then sought to amend his complaint. At that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.