(SS) Ochoa Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20201:19-cv-01046California10,549 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

DANIEL OCHOA LOPEZ,

10 Case No. 1:19-cv-01046-SKO Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL 12

SECURITY COMPLAINT

ANDREW SAUL,

13 Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant. (Doc. 1)

15

16 _____________________________________/ 17

18 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 On July 31, 2019, Plaintiff Daniel Ochoa Lopez (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint under 42 21 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) seeking judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of 22 Social Security (the “Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his applications for disability 23 insurance benefits (“DIB”) and Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) under the Social Security 24 Act (the “Act”). (Doc. 1.) The matter is currently before the Court on the parties’ briefs, which 25 were submitted, without oral argument, to the Honorable Sheila K. Oberto, United States Magistrate 26 Judge.1 27

28 1 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a U.S. Magistrate Judge. (Docs. 7,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.