Vasquez
Vasquez v. County of Stanislaus
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICARDO VASQUEZ, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-01610-AWI-SAB 11 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ 12 UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND v. DISCOVERY DEADLINES 13 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS, et al., ORDER VACATING NOVEMBER 18, 2020 14 HEARING Defendants. 15 (ECF Nos. 29, 32)
16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Currently before the Court is Plaintiffs Ricardo Vasquez’s (“Vasquez”), and R.V.’s, a 20 minor by and through his guardian ad litem Jessica Santos, (collectively “Plaintiffs”), motion to 21 amend the scheduling order to extend the fact and expert discovery deadlines, filed October 26, 22 2020. (ECF No. 29.) Having considered Plaintiffs’ moving papers and Defendants’ statement of 23 non-opposition, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument. See 24 Local Rule 230(g). The previously scheduled hearing set for November 18, 2020, shall be 25 vacated and…