Yellowcake, Inc. v. Triwolf Media, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20201:20-cv-00981California1,665 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 YELLOWCAKE, INC., et al., CASE NO. 1:20-CV-0981 AWI SKO

11 Plaintiffs

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

12 v. TO STRIKE AND PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO STRIKE

13 TRIWOLF MEDIA, LLC, et al.,

14 Defendants (Doc. Nos. 22, 28)

15 16 17 This is a copyright dispute. Currently before the Court are Defendant Triwolf Media, 18 LLC’s and Tango Multimedia Productions, LLC’s (collectively “T&T”) motion to strike under 19 Cal. Code Civ. P. § 425.16 (“Slapp Motion”)1 and Plaintiffs’ motion to strike T&Ts reply/notice 20 of non-opposition. 21 Background 22 On September 28, 2020, T&T filed an answer to the Complaint. 23 On October 2, 2020, T&T filed their Slapp Motion. 24 On October 19, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). 25 On November 2, 2020, T&T filed what is identified on the docket as a “reply” but that is 26 actually styled on the document itself as a notice of non-opposition. See Doc. No. 24. The notice 27 explained that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.