Cleveland v. United States Department of Agriculture

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 TIMOTHY CLEVELAND, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01140-NONE-JLT ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE 13 v. ) TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS ) 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) [21-DAY DEADLINE] AGRICULTURE, et al., 15 ) ) 16 Defendants. )

17 On October 9, 2020, the Court dismissed the second amended complaint, and directed the 18 plaintiff to file a third amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action within 30 19 days. (Doc. 11.) More than 30 days have passed, and the plaintiff has not filed a third amended 20 complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal. 21 The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of 22 counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the 23 Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District 24…