Cleveland v. United States Department of Agriculture

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

TIMOTHY CLEVELAND, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-01140-NONE-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION ) SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE v. ) TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS ) UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF ) [21-DAY DEADLINE] AGRICULTURE, et al., ) ) Defendants. )

On October 9, 2020, the Court dismissed the second amended complaint, and directed the plaintiff to file a third amended complaint or a notice of voluntary dismissal of the action within 30 days. (Doc. 11.) More than 30 days have passed, and the plaintiff has not filed a third amended complaint or notice of voluntary dismissal. The Local Rules, corresponding with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11, provide, “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with . . . any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” Local Rule 110. “District 24…