(PS) Ward v. Department of Child Protective Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20202:19-cv-00652California333 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL N. WARD, No. 2:19-cv-652-MCE EFB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DEPARTMENT OF CHILD

PROTECTIVE SERVICES, MEGAN

DANIELS, MARINA CHAMBERS, Defendants. 17 On September 29, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.1 Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orland v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1999). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified Sch. Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 26 Although it appears from the file that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.