Amaral
(PC) Muhammad v. Amaral
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANSAR EL MUHAMMAD, No. 2: 20-cv-0069 WBS KJN P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
14 KOURTNEE AMARAL, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On October 22, 2020, the undersigned 18 referred this action to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed this action for 120 days. (ECF 19 No. 30.) For the reasons stated herein, the stay is lifted and the undersigned recommends that this 20 action be dismissed. 21 Plaintiff’s complaint was filed with the court on January 9, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) This 22 action proceeds on the amended complaint filed August 10, 2020 against defendant Kourtnee 23 Amaral. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff alleges that defendant Amaral violated his Eighth Amendment 24 right to adequate medical care and state law by failing to treat his broken hand on or around 25 August 2018. (Id.) 26 The court’s own records reveal that on April 22, 2020, plaintiff filed an amended 27 …