R.H.
R.H. v. City of Redding
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11
12 R.H., a minor, by and through NO. 2:20-cv-01435 WBS DMC her guardian ad litem, Sheila 13 Brown; ESTATE OF ERIC JAY HAMES, by and through its 14 personal representative, Crystal Dunlap-Bennett, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 CITY OF REDDING, a public 18 entity; JOE ROSSI, an individual; KIP KINNEAVY, an 19 individual; JAY GUTERDING, an individual; and DOES 5-20, 20 inclusive, 21 Defendants. 22 23 ----oo0oo---- 24 STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER 25 After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the 26 court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference 27 scheduled for November 23, 2020, and makes the following findings 28 and orders without needing to consult with the parties any 1 further. 2 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 3 All defendants have been served, and no further service 4 is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown 5 under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). 6 II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS 7 …