R.H.

R.H. v. City of Redding

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20202:20-cv-01435California1,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo----

R.H., a minor, by and through NO. 2:20-cv-01435 WBS DMC her guardian ad litem, Sheila Brown; ESTATE OF ERIC JAY HAMES, by and through its personal representative, Crystal Dunlap-Bennett, 15 Plaintiffs, 16 v. 17 CITY OF REDDING, a public entity; JOE ROSSI, an individual; KIP KINNEAVY, an individual; JAY GUTERDING, an individual; and DOES 5-20, inclusive, Defendants. 22 ----oo0oo---- STATUS (PRETRIAL SCHEDULING) ORDER After reviewing the parties’ Joint Status Report, the court hereby vacates the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference scheduled for November 23, 2020, and makes the following findings and orders without needing to consult with the parties any further. I. SERVICE OF PROCESS All defendants have been served, and no further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(b). II. JOINDER OF PARTIES/AMENDMENTS …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.