(PS) Tillman-Conerly v. U.S. Office of Personnel Management

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20202:20-cv-00950California1,945 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARILYN TILLMAN-CONERLY, No. 2:20-cv-950-TLN-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS AND TO DENY MOTION FOR

v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT U.S. OFFICE OF PERSONNEL (ECF Nos. 7, 9.) MANAGEMENT et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On May 8, 2020, plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint against the U.S. Office of Personnel Management and Laverne Watson (an employee thereof). (ECF No. 1.) On May 12, 2020, the Clerk issued a summons. (ECF No. 2.) On July 13, 2020, plaintiff filed a “Motion for Extension of Time” to serve defendants, stating she could not serve the complaint because the government offices were closed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. (See ECF No. 4.) Plaintiff requested a stay of the action until the offices re-opened. Id. The court denied plaintiff’s request for a stay and ordered plaintiff to serve defendants by August 31, 2020. (See ECF No. 5.) On August 18, plaintiff filed documents with the court in order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.