Newsom
(PC) Cross v. Newsom
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 QUINTIN R. CROSS, No. 2:19-cv-02462-WBS-CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this federal civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to this court by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Following a review of plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis, plaintiff was advised that he failed to demonstrate his indigency in order to be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 5. As a result, plaintiff was denied in forma pauperis status, but was granted an extension of time in order to pay the filing fees for this action. ECF No. 5 at 2. In the same order, plaintiff was advised that the complaint appears subject to dismissal for failing to exhaust his administrative remedies. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a); see also Vaden v. Summerhill, 449 F.3d 1047,…